Paris: Sharia law is understood and applied in such varied ways across the Muslim world that it is difficult to say exactly what it is and how it could fit into a western legal context, according to experts on Islam.
Full Islamic criminal law, the harsh code most non-Muslims think of when they hear the word Sharia, is applied in very few countries, such as Saudi Arabia. Islamic 'personal law' for issues like marriage and inheritance is much more common.
Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams sparked off a storm last week by suggesting Britain adopt some sharia law. British Muslims defending him stressed most of the Islamic world also rejected the ultra-orthodox model that he clearly ruled out.
"There are 57 Muslim countries in the world and only two or three of them impose full Sharia criminal law. Why on earth would we want to have that here?" asked Sheikh Suhaib Hasan, secretary of the Islamic Sharia Council in Britain.
There are also widely differing interpretations of Sharia, both within the four classical Sunni and one Shia schools of jurisprudence and between traditional and modern thinkers.
"In the Muslim world these days, 'Sharia' means a whole variety of different things," said John Voll, professor of Islamic history at Georgetown University in Washington.
Williams apparently had in mind a modern school of Muslim thinking that sees Sharia as a system of essential Islamic values rather than a fixed code of harsh punishments, he said.
LIMITED USE
Most Muslim states limit the use of Sharia to 'personal law' on issues such as marriage, divorce, inheritance and child custody. Western critics say most Muslim personal law limits women's rights and introduces inequality before the law.
Egypt says Sharia is the main source of its legislation, but has penal and civil codes based mostly on 19th century French law. Hudoud, the corporal and capital punishment outlined in the Quran, has not been applied there in modern times.
Muslims cannot convert to other faiths and non-Muslims who convert to Islam are not supposed to leave it, but a court allowed this for 12 people in a landmark case last week.
Pakistan has a similar split between civil and penal codes carried over from the British colonial period and Muslim personal law. It also has a Federal Sharia Court to decide if laws passed by parliament conform to Islam.
Apart from a few public lashings since Islamisation started in the 1980s, harsh physical punishments have not been imposed. Nobody has been executed under a law banning blasphemy against Islam, but some accused blasphemers have been killed by mobs.
Full Islamic criminal law, the harsh code most non-Muslims think of when they hear the word Sharia, is applied in very few countries, such as Saudi Arabia. Islamic 'personal law' for issues like marriage and inheritance is much more common.
Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams sparked off a storm last week by suggesting Britain adopt some sharia law. British Muslims defending him stressed most of the Islamic world also rejected the ultra-orthodox model that he clearly ruled out.
"There are 57 Muslim countries in the world and only two or three of them impose full Sharia criminal law. Why on earth would we want to have that here?" asked Sheikh Suhaib Hasan, secretary of the Islamic Sharia Council in Britain.
There are also widely differing interpretations of Sharia, both within the four classical Sunni and one Shia schools of jurisprudence and between traditional and modern thinkers.
"In the Muslim world these days, 'Sharia' means a whole variety of different things," said John Voll, professor of Islamic history at Georgetown University in Washington.
Williams apparently had in mind a modern school of Muslim thinking that sees Sharia as a system of essential Islamic values rather than a fixed code of harsh punishments, he said.
LIMITED USE
Most Muslim states limit the use of Sharia to 'personal law' on issues such as marriage, divorce, inheritance and child custody. Western critics say most Muslim personal law limits women's rights and introduces inequality before the law.
Egypt says Sharia is the main source of its legislation, but has penal and civil codes based mostly on 19th century French law. Hudoud, the corporal and capital punishment outlined in the Quran, has not been applied there in modern times.
Muslims cannot convert to other faiths and non-Muslims who convert to Islam are not supposed to leave it, but a court allowed this for 12 people in a landmark case last week.
Pakistan has a similar split between civil and penal codes carried over from the British colonial period and Muslim personal law. It also has a Federal Sharia Court to decide if laws passed by parliament conform to Islam.
Apart from a few public lashings since Islamisation started in the 1980s, harsh physical punishments have not been imposed. Nobody has been executed under a law banning blasphemy against Islam, but some accused blasphemers have been killed by mobs.
No comments:
Post a Comment